注册 登录
滑铁卢中文论坛 返回首页

风萧萧的个人空间 http://www.shuicheng.ca/bbs/?61910 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

By the Name of Democracy to Free Brain-defeactives Killing Innocents

已有 142 次阅读2016-1-27 10:41 |个人分类:Frank's Writings

By the Name of Democracy to Free Brain-defeactives Killing Innocents

       --- Some Fantasies Inspired by 90-year-old Kissinger's concerns on Ukrainian Crisis

                   Frank  March 7, 2014, in Waterloo, On. Ca.

     http://frank-waterloo.blog.163.com/blog/static/2052390292014271153641/

     March 7, 2014, the article of Henry A. Kissinger‘s <How the Ukraine crisis ends> inspired me a feeling that there some thing have to say, I am aware clearly, my ideas here have somewhat sense of fantasies and irrelevant with the topic, but, my concern is more in digging root reason to avoid the regeneration of the Ukrainian-style social unrests, less in concerning the current unrest in the Ukraine.

     Though, the Ukrainian Crisis is different with that of in Iraq, or those countries have suffered Arab Spring, the fuse of detonating such social bomb is not mainly due to the reason of Dictator or the Democracy? But, the end result is the same, that is, there innocent civilians were killed.

     Now political leaders of major countries are actively mediations. However, the politicians will not ignore their own national interests, especially in the West, there still is strong Cold War mentality, so those mediations most likely make the situation deteriorate.
     We should ask that, whether there are dirty political hands from other countries to stir up the Ukrainian Crisis after seeing that the Ukraine and Russia goes to close. We should also ask that, whether there are dirty political hands from other countries to manipulate some Ukrainian to kill their own country-people.
     Kind people must have deeply worried for the current social uprest in Iraq, the endless bomb-blasts result the terrible casualties of the innocent Iraqi people and have led them live in the life of terror. 
     Is it the Iraqi people too ignorance to enjoy the Democracy that Americans forced gift to them?  Or, the American politicians intendedly did some thing else under the guise of democracy?Or, for being the U.S. President or being the U.S. policy-makers, it only can be able to truly meet their political prerogative addiction by personally commanding the army to carry out the massacre? 
     In Canada, I met some Iraqi refugees, there many times ask them with the same question that: how to view the former president Saddam Hussein? Their answers are similar: Before we hated him, he was too brutal. However, now we miss him and hope that he is still our president, because only he can guarantee a peaceful life for us.
     Democracy is good, but not a political panacea that is suitable for all of the races or the countries, or to the particular historical stage of those races or countries, especially for the regions of the forces of Religions or Tribes are too strong. 
     Please think that, today, who? is it the Democracy? Or, is it great United States of America? ......? Can give the peace to the people of Iraq, Libya, and Egypt, and those will be coming soon, because of that the troops of the United States are free now after finished great balancing jobs in the Iraq and Afghanistan.

     The U.S. military now is being sent to the Asia-Pacific to make the same balance for the countries in there, so that the people of those countries can enjoy a life as that of Iraqis and Afghans are enjoying in their hometowns that U.S. has full-heartedly balanced with the exchanges by the blood and lives of their Young American soldiers who are from the innocent American families.

     There are reports that even though these soldiers survived in the balancing tasks on the battlefield in Iraq or Afghanistan and lukily returned to the home in U.S., but, they would lifelong unlukily live in the fear of terror battlefield psychological injuries, and many of them have committed suicide to end this fear.

     Historically, by the Guises of their Faith, some people launched Crusades to carry out Massacre.

     Today, by the Guises of Democracy, some people also intendedly carry out Massacre by launching political unrest in their interested regions or countries, no matter their purpose is how nice, but the actual result is as so. What have happened in the Iraq, and Afghanistan are the best proof.

     Dec. 02, 2014, <659 people killed in Iraq's violence in November>

     Jan. 19, 2014, <22 killed, 65 wounded in bombing attacks in Iraq's capital>.

     Feb. 27, 2014, <47 killed, over 70 injured in Iraq violence>.

     Mar. 09, 2014, <Suicide bomber kills 34 at crowded Iraq checkpoint>

     Please compare the behaviors of bomb attacker with that of dictator Saddam Hussein, who is more cruel? One is killing innocents, one is killing for maintaining a safe society.

     Now, let's look back at the crisis in Ukraine, if that Ukraine joins NATO, to lead NATO troops threaten own country directly, Russian President Vladimir Putin will never tolerate, he must fight back as powerful as possible. So that only Kissinger's approach is feasible, that Ukraine should remain in neutral, and to enjoy the benefits from both sides.

     Similarly, South Korea hopes that their two Koreas go to be unified, but we should imagine that, would the North Korea willingly fall into the hands of the Americans? Would mainland China willingly see that the U.S. troops go to the opposite bank of the Yalu River to directly threaten own security?

     If the South Korea has not been conducting military exercises again and again with the United States to threaten the North Korea, that North Korea would not develop nuclear weapons, and now, the most likely victim of such nuclear weapons is the South Korea its self. 

     South Korea is a country full of beautiful dreams that are rich in unrealistic fantasies to have mindlessly swallowed a dose of Hallucinogens that the U.S. formulated and they joint-prepared. Now. it has been stumbled with no choice, butmust pay for the installation of anti-missile systems of the United States and the spending for American troops stationing in South Korea. 

     Feb. 24, 2014, <2014 US - South Korean Key Resolve and Foal Eagle beyond War>On Monday, combined South Korean and US military forces began the annual Key Resolve command post and Foal Eagle field training exercise, repeating the circle of stressing inner Korean relations. 

     Mar. 03, 2014, <N. Korea fires seven additional short-range projectiles>:SEOUL, March 4 (Yonhap) -- North Korea fired seven short-range projectiles from its east coast Tuesday using a multiple rocket launcher, Seoul's defense ministry said, the latest in a series of provocations by the communist country as the U.S. and South Korea entered the second week of joint military drills.

     American holds the nose od South Korea to make military exercises to deter North Korea, but North Korea is not afraid at all, firing missiles, South Korea fear.

     Mar. 12, 2014, <SKorea to buy PAC-3 missiles next year>: SEOUL, March 12 (Yonhap) -- South Korea will upgrade its present PAC-2 air defense system and buy PAC-3 missiles next year to improve its anti-ballistic missile capability against North Korea, the state arms procurer said Wednesday.
     It is the great Harvest from Military Exercises with Americans forced by holding own nose.     

     .......

    With eye on Crimea, U.S. starts military drills on Russia's doorstep, a group of 3 years old stupids think that others arealso stupid as same as them selves. They hope that Vladimir Putin would be frightened to retreat by the intimidation of chimpanzees heavily slapping on own chest.  

     .......

     It Is Time to Kick Out Brain-Defective Politicians by MRI Scan.

     .......

     I appreciate Henry Kissinger's flexible approaches that base on the objective actual circumstances, his ideas are few in rigid and dogmatic, in historically. Please review the end of the Vietnam War and the end of the China-U.S. cold War, and more.

     In the West, many people are advocating the Art of The Art of War of Sun Tzu in 2500 years ago China, but lesser of them truely getting the essence the writer's thoughts, it is that how to keep in peace, rather than that of how to stir up and win a war: "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting."

    That's the reason that I appreciate the wises of Henry A. Kissinger.

    Note, in the article <Management is the Art of Playing Human Nature>, I briefly introduced the historical background of the generation of The Art of War, the process of it was unearthed, the emergence of Chinese characters and the development of the written expression.     

     ........

     More comment comes soon.....

How the Ukraine crisis ends

By Henry A. KissingerPublished: March 5

Henry A. Kissinger was secretary of state from 1973 to 1977.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/henry-kissinger-to-settle-the-ukraine-crisis-start-at-the-end/2014/03/05/46dad868-a496-11e3-8466-d34c451760b9_story.html

         

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger speaks with the Kremlin chief of staff during a work meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow Oct. 26, 2013. Michael Klimentyev

             ---AFP/Getty Images from http://www.cbsnews.com/ March 6, 2014, 12:16 PM

    Public discussion on Ukraine is all about confrontation. But do we know where we are going? In my life, I have seen four wars begun with great enthusiasm and public support, all of which we did not know how to end and from three of which we withdrew unilaterally. The test of policy is how it ends, not how it begins.

    Far too often the Ukrainian issue is posed as a showdown: whether Ukraine joins the East or the West. But if Ukraine is to survive and thrive, it must not be either side’s outpost against the other — it should function as a bridge between them.

    Russia must accept that to try to force Ukraine into a satellite status, and thereby move Russia’s borders again, would doom Moscow to repeat its history of self-fulfilling cycles of reciprocal pressures with Europe and the United States.

    The West must understand that, to Russia, Ukraine can never be just a foreign country. Russian history began in what was called Kievan-Rus. The Russian religion spread from there. Ukraine has been part of Russia for centuries, and their histories were intertwined before then. Some of the most important battles for Russian freedom, starting with the Battle of Poltava in 1709 , were fought on Ukrainian soil. The Black Sea Fleet — Russia’s means of projecting power in the Mediterranean — is based by long-term lease in Sevastopol, in Crimea. Even such famed dissidents as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Joseph Brodsky insisted that Ukraine was an integral part of Russian history and, indeed, of Russia.

    The European Union must recognize that its bureaucratic dilatoriness and subordination of the strategic element to domestic politics in negotiating Ukraine’s relationship to Europe contributed to turning a negotiation into a crisis. Foreign policy is the art of establishing priorities.

    The Ukrainians are the decisive element. They live in a country with a complex history and a polyglot composition. The Western part was incorporated into the Soviet Union in 1939 , when Stalin and Hitler divided up the spoils. Crimea, 60 percent of whose population is Russian , became part of Ukraine only in 1954 , when Nikita Khrushchev, a Ukrainian by birth, awarded it as part of the 300th-year celebration of a Russian agreement with the Cossacks. The west is largely Catholic; the east largely Russian Orthodox. The west speaks Ukrainian; the east speaks mostly Russian. Any attempt by one wing of Ukraine to dominate the other — as has been the pattern — would lead eventually to civil war or break up. To treat Ukraine as part of an East-West confrontation would scuttle for decades any prospect to bring Russia and the West — especially Russia and Europe — into a cooperative international system.

    Ukraine has been independent for only 23 years; it had previously been under some kind of foreign rule since the 14th century. Not surprisingly, its leaders have not learned the art of compromise, even less of historical perspective. The politics of post-independence Ukraine clearly demonstrates that the root of the problem lies in efforts by Ukrainian politicians to impose their will on recalcitrant parts of the country, first by one faction, then by the other. That is the essence of the conflict between Viktor Yanu?kovych and his principal political rival, Yulia Tymo?shenko. They represent the two wings of Ukraine and have not been willing to share power. A wise U.S. policy toward Ukraine would seek a way for the two parts of the country to cooperate with each other. We should seek reconciliation, not the domination of a faction.

    Russia and the West, and least of all the various factions in Ukraine, have not acted on this principle. Each has made the situation worse. Russia would not be able to impose a military solution without isolating itself at a time when many of its borders are already precarious. For the West, the demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.

    Putin should come to realize that, whatever his grievances, a policy of military impositions would produce another Cold War. For its part, the United States needs to avoid treating Russia as an aberrant to be patiently taught rules of conduct established by Washington. Putin is a serious strategist — on the premises of Russian history. Understanding U.S. values and  psychology are not his strong suits. Nor has understanding Russian history and psychology been a strong point of U.S. policymakers.

    Leaders of all sides should return to examining outcomes, not compete in posturing. Here is my notion of an outcome compatible with the values and security interests of all sides:

    1. Ukraine should have the right to choose freely its economic and political associations, including with Europe.

    2. Ukraine should not join NATO, a position I took seven years ago, when it last came up.

    3. Ukraine should be free to create any government compatible with the expressed will of its people. Wise Ukrainian leaders would then opt for a policy of reconciliation between the various parts of their country. Internationally, they should pursue a posture comparable to that of Finland. That nation leaves no doubt about its fierce independence and cooperates with the West in most fields but carefully avoids institutional hostility toward Russia.

    4. It is incompatible with the rules of the existing world order for Russia to annex Crimea. But it should be possible to put Crimea’s relationship to Ukraine on a less fraught basis. To that end, Russia would recognize Ukraine’s sovereignty over Crimea. Ukraine should reinforce Crimea’s autonomy in elections held in the presence of international observers. The process would include removing any ambiguities about the status of the Black Sea Fleet at Sevastopol.

These are principles, not prescriptions. People familiar with the region will know that not all of them will be palatable to all parties. The test is not absolute satisfaction but balanced dissatisfaction. If some solution based on these or comparable elements is not achieved, the drift toward confrontation will accelerate. The time for that will come soon enough.

1151 Comments

Western mercenaries behind killing demonstrators in Ukraine

      by  Jim W. Dean, VT  Editor  with  Press TV, Tehran March 6th, 2014,

       http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/06/western-mercenaries-behind-killing-demonstrators-in-ukraine/

Ukraine crisis ratchets up as some Crimeans welcome Russian troops (+video)

Ukraine's confrontation with Russia over Crimea deepened today, with claims that Ukraine's top admiral defected and Russian troop movements in the peninsula.

By Sabra Ayres, Correspondent / March 2, 2014

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0302/Ukraine-crisis-ratchets-up-as-some-Crimeans-welcome-Russian-troops-video

Pro-Russian activists wave Russian flags at a rally in front of the City Hall in Donetsk, Ukraine, Sunday, March 2, 2014.  Sergei Vaganov/AP

Simferopol, Ukraine

The calm that prevailed in the streets of Crimea’s major cities Sunday belied an escalating and ugly situation. Russian troops are reported to be digging trenches on the border, the head of Ukraine's navy was accused of treason after he sided with the Kremlin-backed government of the Crimea region, and the Ukrainian government said it is mobilizing troops in preparation for a possible war against Russian soldiers now surrounding several Ukrainian military bases....

Will America heed the wake-up call of Ukraine?

By Condoleezza RicePublished: March 7

Condoleezza Rice was secretary of state from 2005 to 2009.


路过

雷人

握手

鲜花

鸡蛋

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|小黑屋|手机版|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca

GMT-5, 2024-5-18 00:21 , Processed in 0.025259 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.  

返回顶部