注册 登录
滑铁卢中文论坛 返回首页

风萧萧的个人空间 http://www.shuicheng.ca/bbs/?61910 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

James Galbraith 主流经济学为何误判通胀

已有 449 次阅读2024-8-4 08:47 |个人分类:John Kenneth

James  Galbraith 主流经济学为何误判通胀

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/transitory-inflation-why-mainstream-economics-got-it-wrong-by-james-k-galbraith-2023-11

2023 年 11 月 15 日 James K. Galbraith

2021-22 年主要经济学家对通胀的误判是一系列长期失败中的最新一集,从未能预见 2008 年金融危机到支持 2010 年代自我毁灭的紧缩政策。要么主流经济学家需要重新审视他们的核心信念,要么这个行业需要新的主流。

奥斯汀——经济学家保罗·克鲁格曼在 2023 年 11 月 7 日的《纽约时报》时事通讯中提出了一个很好的问题,尽管有些迟了:为什么这么多经济学家对通胀前景的判断是错误的?毕竟,近年来主流经济学家几乎一致认为,通胀将持续,甚至加速,这为美联储大幅加息提供了理由。然而,2021-22 年的准通胀被证明是暂时的。

Why Mainstream Economics Got Inflation Wrong

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/transitory-inflation-why-mainstream-economics-got-it-wrong-by-james-k-galbraith-2023-11

 

Leading economists' misdiagnosis of inflation in 2021-22 was the latest episode in a long-running series of failures, from not foreseeing the 2008 financial crisis to endorsing self-destructive austerity in the 2010s. Either mainstream economists need to re-examine their core beliefs, or the profession needs a new mainstream.

AUSTIN – In his November 7, 2023 New York Times newsletter, the economist Paul Krugman asks a good, albeit belated, question: Why did so many economists get the inflation outlook wrong? After all, the near-consensus among mainstream economists in recent years was that inflation would persist – and even accelerate – and that this justified substantial interest-rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve. Yet the quasi-inflation of 2021-22 proved transitory.


路过

雷人

握手

鲜花

鸡蛋

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|小黑屋|手机版|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca

GMT-5, 2025-12-15 02:07 , Processed in 0.035492 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.  

返回顶部